Plea in Supreme Court challenges definition of caste discrimination in 2026 UGC regulations

Date:


 The plea said the regulation violates the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14 (right to equality) and 15(1), and Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. File
| Photo Credit: Sushil Kumar Verma

A plea was filed in the Supreme Court challenging a recently notified University Grants Commission (UGC) regulation, alleging that it has adopted a non-inclusionary definition of caste-based discrimination and excludes certain categories from institutional protection.

The plea submitted that regulation 3(c) of the recently notified UGC (Promotion of Equity in Higher Education Institutions) Regulations, 2026 is “non-inclusionary” and fails to protect students and faculty who do not belong to reserved categories.

The plea, filed by Vineet Jindal, assailed the regulation on the grounds that caste-based discrimination is defined strictly as discrimination against members of the Scheduled Castes (SC), Scheduled Tribes (ST), and Other Backward Classes (OBC).

It is said that by limiting the scope of “caste-based discrimination” only to SC, ST, and OBC categories, the UGC has effectively denied institutional protection and grievance redressal to individuals belonging to the “general” or non-reserved categories who may also face harassment or bias based on their caste identity.

It said the provision in its present “exclusionary form” creates a hierarchy of protection that is unconstitutional. The plea said the regulation violates the fundamental rights guaranteed under articles 14 (right to equality) and 15(1) (Prohibition of discrimination by the State on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth).

It also alleged that the regulation violates Article 21 (the right to life and personal liberty, which includes the right to live with dignity) of the Constitution.

It urged the top court to restrain the authorities from enforcing regulation 3(c) in its current form and sought a direction to redefine caste-based discrimination in a “caste-neutral and constitutionally-compliant manner.” “Caste-based discrimination should be defined so that protection is accorded to all persons discriminated against based on caste, irrespective of their specific caste identity,” Court said.

The plea has sought interim directions to the Union Government and the UGC to ensure that the “Equal Opportunity Centres,” “Equity Helplines,” and “Ombudsperson” mechanisms established under these regulations are made available to all students in a non-discriminatory manner, pending a formal reconsideration of the definition.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Andy Samberg Sings Neil Diamond’s ‘Sweet Caroline’ for Super Bowl Ad

Move over, Hugh Jackman — it’s Andy Samberg’s turn...

Today’s Al Roker on Retirement, 30th Anniversary on Morning Show 

Al Roker has a low chance of inactivity in...

LVMH beats forecasts in Q4 2025 earnings report

Luxury conglomerate LVMH reported better-than-expected earnings after the bell...