India
oi-Prakash KL
The Supreme Court on Friday cautioned against introducing a law mandating menstrual leave for women, warning it could harm their employment prospects and reinforce negative stereotypes.
Chief Justice Surya Kant, heading the bench, observed that compulsory menstrual leave could deter employers from hiring women. “Creating awareness and sensitisation is different… but the moment you bring in a law mandating menstrual leave, nobody will hire them,” NDTV quoted him as saying during a hearing on a petition filed by lawyer Shailendra Mani Tripathi.
The Supreme Court cautioned that mandatory menstrual leave laws could harm women’s employment prospects and reinforce stereotypes. Chief Justice Surya Kant suggested compulsory leave might deter employers, contrasting it with voluntary policies and initiatives like Kerala’s student leave.
The petitioner had sought directions to states to frame rules allowing women, including students and professionals, to take leave during menstruation.
The Chief Justice argued that such measures could inadvertently create a perception that women are “less” than men. “They will call women inferior and say menstruation is something ‘bad’ happening to them,” he remarked, stressing that the plea risked instilling fear rather than promoting equality.
Senior Advocate MR Shamshad, appearing in support of the petition, pointed out that Kerala had introduced menstrual leave for women students in state-run universities in 2013. At the time, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan described the move as part of a commitment to building a gender-just society. Shamshad also noted that several private companies had voluntarily adopted similar policies.
The Chief Justice, however, distinguished between voluntary initiatives and legal mandates. “The moment you say ‘compulsory in law’, nobody will give them jobs. Nobody will take them in judiciary or government jobs… their career is over. They will say ‘you should sit at home’,” he cautioned.
The debate comes against the backdrop of a landmark Supreme Court ruling in January, which recognised menstrual hygiene as an integral part of a girl child’s right to life, dignity, health, and education under Article 21 of the Constitution. In that judgement, Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan directed governments to provide free sanitary napkins, functional gender-segregated toilets, and awareness campaigns on menstrual health.
-
What Is Passive Euthanasia? Supreme Court Permits It For Man In Coma For Nearly 12 Years
-
Delete Privacy-Violating Audio Clip In 24 Hours Or Face Legal Action: Rashmika After Old Video Linking Rakshit
-
Instagram Down? Users Report DMs or Messaging Glitches as Complaints Cross 10,000
-
Gold Silver Rate Today, 12 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Gold Stays Strong While Silver Slips
-
Gold Rate Today 11 March 2026: Fresh IBJA Gold Rates; Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan Jewellery Prices
-
Gold Rate Today 12 March 2026: IBJA Issues New Gold Rates; Tanishq, Malabar, Joyalukkas, Kalyan Prices
-
UPSC Result: Astha Jain’s Rank 9 Achievement Sparks EWS Quota Debate
-
Gold Silver Rate Today, 11 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Gold Gains As Silver Climbs Across India
-
LPG Cylinder Booking Made Easy: How to Refill Your HP, Indane Gas Cylinder By Missed Call, SMS or WhatsApp
-
RCB Unbox Event 2026: Bengaluru’s Chinnaswamy Stadium to Host Season Launch on March 20 or 22
-
LPG Cylinder Rules In India: How Many Gas Cylinders Can You Keep At Home Legally?
-
Bangalore Gold Silver Rate Today, March 11, 2026: Gold Prices Jump, Silver Steady as Global Tensions Push Safe


