Gauhati High Court overturns Arunachal IAS officer’s bail in teen suicide case

Date:


Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer of the High Court’s Itanagar Bench ordered on Wednesday (January 22, 2026) that  IAS officer Talo Potom, facing charges of abetment to suicide, be taken into custody immediately.
| Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

GUWAHATI

The Gauhati High Court has revoked a lower court’s order granting bail to Arunachal Pradesh IAS officer Talo Potom, who was named in the suicide notes of a 19-year-old in 2025.

Mr. Potom, a Special Secretary (PWD) in the Government of Delhi, was released within a week of his arrest.

Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer of the High Court’s Itanagar Bench ordered on Wednesday (January 22, 2026) that Potom, facing charges of abetment to suicide, be taken into custody immediately. The bench criticised the District and Sessions Court at Yupia for granting bail “without proper application of mind.”

The victim’s father approached the High Court under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to seek cancellation of bail.

The case originated from an FIR lodged by the man after his son was found dead at his rented accommodation in Papum Pare district on October 23, 2025. In the notes left behind, the deceased accused Mr. Potom and senior engineer Likwang Lowang of sexually exploiting and harassing him over a prolonged period.

The notes mentioned that “prolonged humiliation, coercion, and threats” drove him to take the extreme step. The charges against the officials included abetment to suicide, sexual exploitation, mental harassment, and corruption. Hours after the FIR was filed, Lowang, who worked in the State’s Rural Works Department, shot himself.

In its order, the High Court said the trial court had ignored crucial materials and recorded findings contrary to established legal principles governing bail. The bench emphasised that the offence had “shocked the collective conscience of the society,” a factor the lower court failed to consider.

The HC Bench noted that while cancellation of bail should not be routine, it is permissible if the order is unjustified, perverse, or ignores material facts. It added that releasing an influential officer like Potom at the early stage of the investigation, despite a prima facie case, could have derailed the probe.

(Arunachal Pradesh suicide prevention helpline numbers: 14416, 1800-89-14416)



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

Three minors arrested for burglary in Jeedimetla

Three minors were arrested by Petbasheerabad police in connection...

Guacamole Recipes for Every Dip Fan

Up your guacamole game with some of our...

149 Million Accounts’ Login Credentials Leaked: Cybersecurity Report

Over 149 million account credentials from various internet platforms,...

Mariska Hargitay Wore Baggy Wide-Leg Jeans, Get the Look

Celebrities keep reaching for roomy, comfy-looking style staples...